I heard a great definition of the word “privacy” while listening to a podcast a few weeks back;
Privacy is the ability to control who has access to you and, by extension, information about you, the medium through which one has such access and when one is allowed to have such access.
It has become obvious that the surveillance state and economy we live in today has destroyed any resemblance of privacy most of us ever had, or thought we had, over the past few decades.
This being said, did you know the word “privacy” does not appear anywhere in the Constitution or even the Bill of Rights?
Hard to believe, but this is a confirmed fact.
The right to privacy is, however, widely considered to be implied through several amendments, though this has been a subject of ongoing constitutional interpretation and debate.
The key amendments that courts have interpreted as implying privacy rights include:
First Amendment – Freedom of association and belief implies some privacy in personal relationships and thoughts
Third Amendment – Prohibition against quartering soldiers in homes suggests a zone of privacy in one’s residence
Fourth Amendment – Protection against unreasonable searches and seizures is perhaps the strongest textual basis for privacy, requiring warrants based on probable cause
Fifth Amendment – Protection against self-incrimination suggests privacy of personal information
Ninth Amendment – States that rights not enumerated in the Constitution are retained by the people, which some argue includes privacy
The most famous articulation of this implied right came in a case, Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), where Justice William O. Douglas wrote about “penumbras” and “emanations” from these amendments that create “zones of privacy.” This controversial reasoning established that while privacy isn’t explicitly mentioned, it flows from the “penumbras formed by emanations” of the specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights.
This interpretation has been foundational for subsequent privacy-related decisions, though it still remains debated whether privacy is truly a constitutional right or simply a value protected incidentally through other explicit rights.
I’m no prophet, but I fully expect Digital ID to be the next “Covid” like major event that the globalist psychopaths use to try and further enslave humanity.
Unfortunately, the psychopaths who control the institutions and companies responsible for the invasion of our privacy on every level could care less what our Federal or State Constitution or Bill of Rights have to say on this topic. This is exacerbated by the reality that few people have taken the time to read any of these documents or understand how to leverage them to stand their ground.
What this means is no politician, no piece of legislation, no executive order, no judge, jury or even police force is going to protect your privacy.
This means YOU are responsible for taking a stand. YOU must start removing the tools of surveillance from your life, and start informing people around you, tactfully, to do the same.
For more specifics on how Digital ID is being used as the The Trojan Horse to enslave you and our kids, give the article I wrote on this topic a read HERE.